| Title |
Quadratic voting and the public good: introduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Choice, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11127-017-0404-5 |
| Authors |
Eric A. Posner, E. Glen Weyl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 71% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,656,856
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#275
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,152
of 425,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.