↓ Skip to main content

A case of multiple organ failure with refeeding syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 279)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case of multiple organ failure with refeeding syndrome
Published in
NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2011
DOI 10.3893/jjaam.22.213
Authors

Tomoko Sugimura, Kazuhiko Ajisaka, Daiki Ohta, Junichi Tanaka, Taisuke Kitamura, Hiroyasu Ishikura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#46
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,613
of 190,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.