You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian phenotypic traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms15475 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natasha A. Karp, Jeremy Mason, Arthur L. Beaudet, Yoav Benjamini, Lynette Bower, Robert E. Braun, Steve D.M. Brown, Elissa J. Chesler, Mary E. Dickinson, Ann M. Flenniken, Helmut Fuchs, Martin Hrabe de Angelis, Xiang Gao, Shiying Guo, Simon Greenaway, Ruth Heller, Yann Herault, Monica J. Justice, Natalja Kurbatova, Christopher J. Lelliott, K.C. Kent Lloyd, Ann-Marie Mallon, Judith E. Mank, Hiroshi Masuya, Colin McKerlie, Terrence F. Meehan, Richard F. Mott, Stephen A. Murray, Helen Parkinson, Ramiro Ramirez-Solis, Luis Santos, John R. Seavitt, Damian Smedley, Tania Sorg, Anneliese O. Speak, Karen P. Steel, Karen L. Svenson, Shigeharu Wakana, David West, Sara Wells, Henrik Westerberg, Shay Yaacoby, Jacqueline K. White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 17% |
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 36 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 62% |
| Scientists | 30 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 22% |
| Researcher | 55 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Professor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#161,609
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,299
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,418
of 332,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#45
of 1,066 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,066 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.