| Title |
Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3210-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Goce Spasovski, Raymond Vanholder, Bruno Allolio, Djillali Annane, Steve Ball, Daniel Bichet, Guy Decaux, Wiebke Fenske, Ewout Hoorn, Carole Ichai, Michael Joannidis, Alain Soupart, Robert Zietse, Maria Haller, Sabine van der Veer, Wim Van Biesen, Evi Nagler |
| Abstract |
Hyponatraemia, defined as a serum sodium concentration <135 mmol/L, is the most common disorder of body fluid and electrolyte balance encountered in clinical practice. Hyponatraemia is present in 15-20% of emergency admissions to hospital and occurs in up to 20% of critically ill patients. Symptomatology may vary from subtle to severe or even life threatening. Despite this, the management of patients remains problematic. Against this background, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the European Society of Endocrinology and the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association, represented by European Renal Best Practice have developed a Clinical Practice Guideline on the diagnostic approach and treatment of hyponatraemia as a joint venture of three societies representing specialists with a natural interest in hyponatraemia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Turkey | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 61 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 58 | 17% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 77 | 23% |
| Unknown | 42 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 238 | 72% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | <1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,281,672
of 24,044,816 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,147
of 5,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,179
of 229,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,044,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.