↓ Skip to main content

Cross-Reactivity of Peanut Allergens

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Cross-Reactivity of Peanut Allergens
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11882-014-0426-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Merima Bublin, Heimo Breiteneder

Abstract

Peanut seeds are currently widely used as source of human food ingredients in the United States of America and in European countries due to their high quality protein and oil content. This article describes the classification and molecular biology of peanut seed allergens with particular reference to their cross-reactivities. Currently, the IUIS allergen nomenclature subcommittee accepts 12 peanut allergens. Two allergens belong to the cupin and four to the prolamin superfamily, and six are distributed among profilins, Bet v 1-like proteins, oleosins, and defensins. Clinical observations frequently report an association of peanut allergy with allergies to legumes, tree nuts, seeds, fruits and pollen. Molecular cross-reactivity has been described between members of the Bet v 1-like proteins, the non-specific lipid transfer proteins, and the profilins. This review also addresses the less well-studied cross-reactivity between cupin and prolamin allergens of peanuts and of other plant food sources and the recently discovered cross-reactivity between peanut allergens of unrelated protein families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 222 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 23 10%
Other 19 8%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 56 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 59 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,760,788
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#69
of 855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,293
of 231,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.