You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional Annotation of All Salmonid Genomes (FAASG): an international initiative supporting future salmonid research, conservation and aquaculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12864-017-3862-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Macqueen, Craig R. Primmer, Ross D. Houston, Barbara F. Nowak, Louis Bernatchez, Steinar Bergseth, William S. Davidson, Cristian Gallardo-Escárate, Tom Goldammer, Yann Guiguen, Patricia Iturra, James W. Kijas, Ben F. Koop, Sigbjørn Lien, Alejandro Maass, Samuel A. M. Martin, Philip McGinnity, Martin Montecino, Kerry A. Naish, Krista M. Nichols, Kristinn Ólafsson, Stig W. Omholt, Yniv Palti, Graham S. Plastow, Caird E. Rexroad, Matthew L. Rise, Rachael J. Ritchie, Simen R. Sandve, Patricia M. Schulte, Alfredo Tello, Rodrigo Vidal, Jon Olav Vik, Anna Wargelius, José Manuel Yáñez, The FAASG Consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 15% |
| United States | 8 | 13% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 52% |
| Scientists | 29 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,162,346
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#168
of 11,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,059
of 330,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#7
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.