↓ Skip to main content

Enabling Precision Cardiology Through Multiscale Biology and Systems Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Basic to Translational Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enabling Precision Cardiology Through Multiscale Biology and Systems Medicine
Published in
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.11.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kipp W. Johnson, Khader Shameer, Benjamin S. Glicksberg, Ben Readhead, Partho P. Sengupta, Johan L.M. Björkegren, Jason C. Kovacic, Joel T. Dudley

Abstract

The traditional paradigm of cardiovascular disease research derives insight from large-scale, broadly inclusive clinical studies of well-characterized pathologies. These insights are then put into practice according to standardized clinical guidelines. However, stagnation in the development of new cardiovascular therapies and variability in therapeutic response implies that this paradigm is insufficient for reducing the cardiovascular disease burden. In this state-of-the-art review, we examine 3 interconnected ideas we put forth as key concepts for enabling a transition to precision cardiology: 1) precision characterization of cardiovascular disease with machine learning methods; 2) the application of network models of disease to embrace disease complexity; and 3) using insights from the previous 2 ideas to enable pharmacology and polypharmacology systems for more precise drug-to-patient matching and patient-disease stratification. We conclude by exploring the challenges of applying a precision approach to cardiology, which arise from a deficit of the required resources and infrastructure, and emerging evidence for the clinical effectiveness of this nascent approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 18%
Computer Science 19 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Engineering 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 50 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,785,508
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#156
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,366
of 328,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.