↓ Skip to main content

Deliberative democracy between theory and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Contemporary Political Theory, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Deliberative democracy between theory and practice
Published in
Contemporary Political Theory, June 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41296-017-0128-9
Authors

John Parkinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 43%
Philosophy 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,459,564
of 25,153,613 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Political Theory
#225
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,989
of 321,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Political Theory
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,153,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.