↓ Skip to main content

Blind Man’s Bluff – Elaboration of Fragment Hits in the Absence of Structure for the Development of Antitrypsin Deficiency Inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Chemistry, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blind Man’s Bluff – Elaboration of Fragment Hits in the Absence of Structure for the Development of Antitrypsin Deficiency Inhibitors
Published in
Australian Journal of Chemistry, September 2013
DOI 10.1071/ch13290
Authors

Stephen J. Headey, Mary C. Pearce, Martin J. Scanlon, Stephen P. Bottomley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#4,807,882
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Chemistry
#127
of 1,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,080
of 199,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Chemistry
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,932 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.