You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of effective heart failure self-care: a systematic review of patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heart, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304852 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander M Clark, Melisa Spaling, Karen Harkness, Judith Spiers, Patricia H Strachan, David R Thompson, Kay Currie |
| Abstract |
Disease management interventions for heart failure (HF) are inconsistent and very seldom incorporate the views and needs of patients and their caregivers into intervention design. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 53% |
| Scientists | 8 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 27% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#787,280
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#448
of 6,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,464
of 239,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#5
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.