↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of reporting quality of conference abstracts in sports injury prevention according to CONSORT and STROBE criteria and their subsequent publication rate as full papers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of reporting quality of conference abstracts in sports injury prevention according to CONSORT and STROBE criteria and their subsequent publication rate as full papers
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uzung Yoon, Karsten Knobloch

Abstract

The preliminary results of a study are usually presented as an abstract in conference meetings. The reporting quality of those abstracts and the relationship between their study designs and full paper publication rate is unknown. We hypothesized that randomized controlled trials are more likely to be published as full papers than observational studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,870,000
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#893
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,661
of 161,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.