You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Causal networks clarify productivity–richness interrelations, bivariate plots do not
|
---|---|
Published in |
Functional Ecology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2435.12269 |
Authors |
James B. Grace, Peter B. Adler, W. Stanley Harpole, Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 14% |
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Norway | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 4% |
Argentina | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 270 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 26% |
Researcher | 68 | 23% |
Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 5% |
Other | 47 | 16% |
Unknown | 29 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 154 | 51% |
Environmental Science | 83 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Engineering | 4 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 4% |
Unknown | 34 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,220,451
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#651
of 2,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,758
of 229,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.