↓ Skip to main content

Causal networks clarify productivity–richness interrelations, bivariate plots do not

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Ecology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causal networks clarify productivity–richness interrelations, bivariate plots do not
Published in
Functional Ecology, March 2014
DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12269
Authors

James B. Grace, Peter B. Adler, W. Stanley Harpole, Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 4%
Argentina 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 270 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 26%
Researcher 68 23%
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 51%
Environmental Science 83 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 34 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,220,451
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#651
of 2,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,758
of 229,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.