↓ Skip to main content

On credit and blame: disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
On credit and blame: disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour
Published in
Policy Sciences, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11077-017-9290-4
Authors

Ching Leong, Michael Howlett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 40%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,191,763
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#225
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,159
of 322,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.