↓ Skip to main content

Modelling spatial trends in sorghum breeding field trials using a two-dimensional P-spline mixed model

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Modelling spatial trends in sorghum breeding field trials using a two-dimensional P-spline mixed model
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00122-017-2894-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio G. Velazco, María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez, Martin P. Boer, David R. Jordan, Paul H. C. Eilers, Marcos Malosetti, Fred A. van Eeuwijk

Abstract

A flexible and user-friendly spatial method called SpATS performed comparably to more elaborate and trial-specific spatial models in a series of sorghum breeding trials. Adjustment for spatial trends in plant breeding field trials is essential for efficient evaluation and selection of genotypes. Current mixed model methods of spatial analysis are based on a multi-step modelling process where global and local trends are fitted after trying several candidate spatial models. This paper reports the application of a novel spatial method that accounts for all types of continuous field variation in a single modelling step by fitting a smooth surface. The method uses two-dimensional P-splines with anisotropic smoothing formulated in the mixed model framework, referred to as SpATS model. We applied this methodology to a series of large and partially replicated sorghum breeding trials. The new model was assessed in comparison with the more elaborate standard spatial models that use autoregressive correlation of residuals. The improvements in precision and the predictions of genotypic values produced by the SpATS model were equivalent to those obtained using the best fitting standard spatial models for each trial. One advantage of the approach with SpATS is that all patterns of spatial trend and genetic effects were modelled simultaneously by fitting a single model. Furthermore, we used a flexible model to adequately adjust for field trends. This strategy reduces potential parameter identification problems and simplifies the model selection process. Therefore, the new method should be considered as an efficient and easy-to-use alternative for routine analyses of plant breeding trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Mathematics 7 4%
Computer Science 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,171,640
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#145
of 3,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,989
of 313,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#7
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,667 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.