↓ Skip to main content

Lead in Ammunition: A Persistent Threat to Health and Conservation

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Lead in Ammunition: A Persistent Threat to Health and Conservation
Published in
EcoHealth, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10393-013-0896-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. K. Johnson, T. R. Kelly, B. A. Rideout

Abstract

Many scavenging bird populations have experienced abrupt declines across the globe, and intensive recovery activities have been necessary to sustain several species, including the critically endangered California condor (Gymnogyps californianus). Exposure to lead from lead-based ammunition is widespread in condors and lead toxicosis presents an immediate threat to condor recovery, accounting for the highest proportion of adult mortality. Lead contamination of carcasses across the landscape remains a serious threat to the health and sustainability of scavenging birds, and here we summarize recent evidence for exposure to lead-based ammunition and health implications across many species. California condors and other scavenging species are sensitive indicators of the occurrence of lead contaminated carcasses in the environment. Transdisciplinary science-based approaches have been critical to managing lead exposure in California condors and paving the way for use of non-lead ammunition in California. Similar transdisciplinary approaches are now needed to translate the science informing on this issue and establish education and outreach efforts that focus on concerns brought forth by key stakeholders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 21 19%
Environmental Science 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#17,713,929
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#597
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,278
of 306,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.