↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of ultra-short course chemotherapy for new smear positive drug susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of ultra-short course chemotherapy for new smear positive drug susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12879-017-2505-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengqiu Gao, Jingtao Gao, Jian Du, Yuhong Liu, Yao Zhang, Liping Ma, Fengling Mi, Liang Li, Shenjie Tang, on behalf of the Trial Team

Abstract

Shortening the standard 6-month treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis (DS-PTB) would be a major improvement for TB case management and disease control. We are conducting a randomized, open-label, controlled, non-inferiority trial involving patients with smear-positive, newly diagnosed DS-PTB cases nationwide to assess the efficacy and safety of two 4.5- month regimens in comparison to the standard 6-month WHO recommended regimen. The regimen used in one experiment group is a 4.5-month fluoroquinolone-containing regimen, which consists of full course of levofloxacin, isoniazid (H), rifampin (R), parazinamid (Z) and ethambutol (E). Regimen used in the second experiment group includes 4.5-month full course of H, R, Z, E with levofloxacin removed. Patients in the control group, receive H, R, Z and E for 2 months, followed by 4 months of H and R. The primary endpoint is treatment failure or relapse within 24 month after treatment completion. Results from this trial along with other studies will contribute to the science of constructing a shorter, effective and safe regiment for TB patients. The protocol has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 2 September,2016 with identifier NCT02901288 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Unspecified 7 14%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Unspecified 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,556,449
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,647
of 7,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,737
of 316,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#125
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.