↓ Skip to main content

Eating Disorders and Disordered Weight and Shape Control Behaviors in Sexual Minority Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,267)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
53 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Eating Disorders and Disordered Weight and Shape Control Behaviors in Sexual Minority Populations
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11920-017-0801-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerel P. Calzo, Aaron J. Blashill, Tiffany A. Brown, Russell L. Argenal

Abstract

This review summarized trends and key findings from empirical studies conducted between 2011 and 2017 regarding eating disorders and disordered weight and shape control behaviors among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexual minority (i.e., non-heterosexual) populations. Recent research has examined disparities through sociocultural and minority stress approaches. Sexual minorities continue to demonstrate higher rates of disordered eating; disparities are more pronounced among males. Emerging data indicates elevated risk for disordered eating pathology among sexual minorities who are transgender or ethnic minorities. Dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs may hold promise for sexual minority males. Continued research must examine the intersections of sexual orientation, gender, and ethnic identities, given emergent data that eating disorder risk may be most prominent among specific subgroups. More research is needed within sexual minorities across the lifespan. There is still a lack of eating disorder treatment and prevention studies for sexual minorities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 77 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 92 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 453. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#59,385
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#5
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,305
of 320,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.