↓ Skip to main content

Social–Ecological Network Approaches in Interdisciplinary Research: A Response to Bohan et al. and Dee et al.

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social–Ecological Network Approaches in Interdisciplinary Research: A Response to Bohan et al. and Dee et al.
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Örjan Bodin, Michele L. Barnes, Ryan R.J. McAllister, Juan Carlos Rocha, Angela M. Guerrero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 27%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 20%
Social Sciences 20 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 39 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,717,788
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#997
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,128
of 328,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.