You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Social–Ecological Network Approaches in Interdisciplinary Research: A Response to Bohan et al. and Dee et al.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Örjan Bodin, Michele L. Barnes, Ryan R.J. McAllister, Juan Carlos Rocha, Angela M. Guerrero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
United States | 3 | 8% |
Mexico | 2 | 5% |
Sweden | 2 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 21 | 54% |
Members of the public | 16 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 160 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 27% |
Researcher | 27 | 17% |
Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 15% |
Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 51 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 12% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,717,788
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#997
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,128
of 328,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.