↓ Skip to main content

Delays in the diagnosis and initial treatment of bladder cancer in Western Australia

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Urology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delays in the diagnosis and initial treatment of bladder cancer in Western Australia
Published in
British Journal of Urology, July 2017
DOI 10.1111/bju.13939
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve P. McCombie, Haider K. Bangash, Melvyn Kuan, Isaac Thyer, Fran Lee, Dickon Hayne

Abstract

To quantify and examine the aetiology of delays in the diagnosis and initial treatment of patients with bladder cancer in Western Australia. All attendances at a one-stop haematuria clinic at a public tertiary-level hospital in Western Australia between May 2008 and April 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients diagnosed with a bladder tumour over this period were identified. These patients and their GPs were contacted retrospectively and invited to participate in telephone interviews, with additional data collected from clinical records as required. Waiting times to presentation, referral, assessment, and initial treatment were established for patients who presented with visible haematuria. Of 1365 attendances, 151 patients were diagnosed with a bladder tumour and 100 of these were both suitable and agreed to participate in the study. For patients with visible haematuria the median waiting time from initial bleeding to surgery was 69.5 days (range 9 - 1165). This was comprised of a median (range) pre-referral waiting time of 12 days (0 - 1137), assessment waiting time of 12.5 days (0 - 207), and treatment waiting time of 20 days (1 - 69). Reasons for prolonged waiting times included poor public awareness, patient fear and anxiety, delayed and non-referral from primary care, administrative delays, and resource limitations. Many patients experience significant delay in the diagnosis and treatment of their bladder cancer in Western Australia, and this data likely reflects national trends. This concerning data warrants consideration of how delays can be reduced in order to improve outcomes for these patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Librarian 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Psychology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,330,802
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Urology
#654
of 6,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,305
of 326,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Urology
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.