↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images improve habitat suitability models

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images improve habitat suitability models
Published in
Landscape Ecology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0546-3
Authors

Julie Betbeder, Marianne Laslier, Laurence Hubert-Moy, Françoise Burel, Jacques Baudry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 31%
Environmental Science 14 25%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,900,930
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#1,297
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,130
of 317,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.