You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spatially explicit population estimates for black bears based on cluster sampling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.21294 |
| Authors |
Jacob M. Humm, J. Walter McCown, Brian K. Scheick, Joseph D. Clark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Portugal | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,179,398
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#732
of 2,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,471
of 322,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.