↓ Skip to main content

サポート校生徒と大学進学行動

Overview of attention for article published in Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
サポート校生徒と大学進学行動
Published in
Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2016
DOI 10.11151/eds.98.197
Authors

内田 康弘

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#190
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,057
of 399,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.