↓ Skip to main content

虫の糞を用いた染色

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-Uses / Sen'i Seihin Shohi Kagaku, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 157)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
虫の糞を用いた染色
Published in
Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-Uses / Sen'i Seihin Shohi Kagaku, January 2007
DOI 10.11419/senshoshi1960.48.25
Authors

後北 峰之

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-Uses / Sen'i Seihin Shohi Kagaku
#16
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,264
of 168,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-Uses / Sen'i Seihin Shohi Kagaku
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them