↓ Skip to main content

Smoking and Religion: Untangling Associations Using English Survey Data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Smoking and Religion: Untangling Associations Using English Survey Data
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10943-017-0434-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manzoor Hussain, Charlie Walker, Graham Moon

Abstract

While factors affecting smoking are well documented, the role of religion has received little attention. This national study aims to assess the extent to which religious affiliation is associated with current-smoking and ever-smoking, controlling for age, sex, ethnicity and socio-economic status. Variations between adult and youth populations are examined using secondary analysis of individual-level data from 5 years of the Health Survey for England for adult (aged >20, n = 39,837) and youth (aged 16-20, n = 2355) samples. Crude prevalence statistics are contrasted with binary logistic models for current-smoking and ever-smoking in the adult and youth samples. Analyses suggest that Muslims smoke substantially less than Christians. Highest levels of smoking characterise people not professing any religion. Associations between smoking and the Muslim religion attenuate to statistical insignificance in the face of ethnic and socio-economic factors. An association between smoking and the absence of a religious affiliation is sustained. An understanding of the association between smoking and religion is essential to the development of tobacco control programmes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Lecturer 6 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 36 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 37 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,590,575
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#200
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,273
of 309,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.