↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review
Published in
Hernia, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10029-013-1066-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Eriksson, J. Rosenberg, T. Bisgaard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 18%
Other 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#1,018
of 1,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,066
of 209,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.