↓ Skip to main content

Diversity through duplication: Whole‐genome sequencing reveals novel gene retrocopies in the human population

Overview of attention for article published in BioEssays, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diversity through duplication: Whole‐genome sequencing reveals novel gene retrocopies in the human population
Published in
BioEssays, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/bies.201300181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra R Richardson, Carmen Salvador-Palomeque, Geoffrey J Faulkner

Abstract

Gene retrocopies are generated by reverse transcription and genomic integration of mRNA. As such, retrocopies present an important exception to the central dogma of molecular biology, and have substantially impacted the functional landscape of the metazoan genome. While an estimated 8,000-17,000 retrocopies exist in the human genome reference sequence, the extent of variation between individuals in terms of retrocopy content has remained largely unexplored. Three recent studies by Abyzov et al., Ewing et al. and Schrider et al. have exploited 1,000 Genomes Project Consortium data, as well as other sources of whole-genome sequencing data, to uncover novel gene retrocopies. Here, we compare the methods and results of these three studies, highlight the impact of retrocopies in human diversity and genome evolution, and speculate on the potential for somatic gene retrocopies to impact cancer etiology and genetic diversity among individual neurons in the mammalian brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Portugal 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
India 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 55 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 31%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 37%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,333,178
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BioEssays
#1,025
of 3,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,583
of 228,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEssays
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.