↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Outcome of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)- Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology & Oncology Research, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Long-Term Outcome of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)- Single Center Retrospective Analysis
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12253-017-0266-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grzegorz Helbig, Anna Koclęga, Krzysztof Woźniczka, Małgorzata Kopera, Sławomira Kyrcz-Krzemień

Abstract

For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission without an acceptable HLA donor, the autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) may remain a therapeutic option as remission consolidation, however its role is still a subject of continued debate. One hundred and twenty patients who underwent AHSCT for AML were included in this retrospective single center analysis. The procedure was performed over a 19 years period and transplanted patients were in first complete remission (CR1; n = 109) or in second CR (CR2; n = 11). The median age at transplant was 37 years (range 18-64). The source of stem cells was bone marrow (n = 61; 50.8%), peripheral blood (n = 36; 30%) and bone marrow with peripheral blood (n = 23; 19.2%). The median time from AML diagnosis to AHSCT was 0.8 year (range 0.3-4.4) and the median follow-up after AHSCT for surviving patients was 12.8 years (range 3.1-20.5). The median LFS was 1.1 year. The probability of LFS calculated at 5 years and 10 years after transplantation was 28% (95%CI, 22%-32%) and 21% (95%CI, 18%-24%), respectively. The last relapse occurred 14.8 years after AHSCT and among patients who survived >2 years, 28.4% (27/95) had leukemia recurrence. The median OS was 1.7 years. The probability of OS after 5 years and 10 years was 29% and 22%, respectively. There was a tendency for increased LFS for patients younger than 50 years at transplant if compared to older population. AHSCT for AML was safe with acceptable toxicity profile. Leukemia recurrence remained the leading cause of death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 12 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,431,953
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Pathology & Oncology Research
#465
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,129
of 315,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology & Oncology Research
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.