↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Inherited Cardiomyopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Heart Failure Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Inherited Cardiomyopathies
Published in
Current Heart Failure Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11897-017-0346-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth Varian, W. H. Wilson Tang

Abstract

Cardiomyopathies due to genetic mutations are a heterogeneous group of disorders that comprise diseases of contractility, myocardial relaxation, and arrhythmias. Our goal here is to discuss a limited list of genetically inherited cardiomyopathies and the specific therapeutic strategies used to treat them. Research into the molecular pathophysiology of the development of these cardiomyopathies is leading to the development of novel treatment approaches. Therapies targeting these specific mutations with gene therapy vectors are on the horizon, while other therapies which indirectly affect the physiologic derangements of the mutations are currently being studied and used clinically. Many of these therapies are older medications being given new roles such as mexiletine for Brugada syndrome and diflunisal for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. A newer targeted therapy, the inhibitor of myosin ATPase MYK-461, has been shown to suppress the development of ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis, and myocyte disarray and is being studied as a potential therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. While this field is too large to be completely contained in a single review, we present a large cross section of recent developments in the field of therapeutics for inherited cardiomyopathies. New therapies are on the horizon, and their development will likely result in improved outcomes for patients inflicted by these conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 17%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 27 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,431,953
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Current Heart Failure Reports
#277
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,129
of 315,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Heart Failure Reports
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.