↓ Skip to main content

RGIFE: a ranked guided iterative feature elimination heuristic for the identification of biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
RGIFE: a ranked guided iterative feature elimination heuristic for the identification of biomarkers
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1729-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Lazzarini, Jaume Bacardit

Abstract

Current -omics technologies are able to sense the state of a biological sample in a very wide variety of ways. Given the high dimensionality that typically characterises these data, relevant knowledge is often hidden and hard to identify. Machine learning methods, and particularly feature selection algorithms, have proven very effective over the years at identifying small but relevant subsets of variables from a variety of application domains, including -omics data. Many methods exist with varying trade-off between the size of the identified variable subsets and the predictive power of such subsets. In this paper we focus on an heuristic for the identification of biomarkers called RGIFE: Rank Guided Iterative Feature Elimination. RGIFE is guided in its biomarker identification process by the information extracted from machine learning models and incorporates several mechanisms to ensure that it creates minimal and highly predictive features sets. We compare RGIFE against five well-known feature selection algorithms using both synthetic and real (cancer-related transcriptomics) datasets. First, we assess the ability of the methods to identify relevant and highly predictive features. Then, using a prostate cancer dataset as a case study, we look at the biological relevance of the identified biomarkers. We propose RGIFE, a heuristic for the inference of reduced panels of biomarkers that obtains similar predictive performance to widely adopted feature selection methods while selecting significantly fewer feature. Furthermore, focusing on the case study, we show the higher biological relevance of the biomarkers selected by our approach. The RGIFE source code is available at: http://ico2s.org/software/rgife.html .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,964,842
of 24,384,776 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,791
of 7,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,702
of 318,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#21
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.