You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of genetic, processing, or product formulation changes on efficacy and safety of probiotics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/nyas.12363 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary Ellen Sanders, Todd R. Klaenhammer, Arthur C. Ouwehand, Bruno Pot, Eric Johansen, James T. Heimbach, Maria L. Marco, Julia Tennilä, R. Paul Ross, Charles Franz, Nicolas Pagé, R. David Pridmore, Greg Leyer, Seppo Salminen, Duane Charbonneau, Emma Call, Irene Lenoir‐Wijnkoop |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#4,137
of 12,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,183
of 238,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#43
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.