↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0276-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Burgess, Simon G. Thompson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 29%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Mathematics 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,070,926
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1,243
of 1,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,801
of 315,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#29
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.