↓ Skip to main content

Safe and successful resection of difficult GI lesions using a novel single-step full-thickness resection device (FTRD®)

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Safe and successful resection of difficult GI lesions using a novel single-step full-thickness resection device (FTRD®)
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5676-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. V. Valli, J. Mertens, P. Bauerfeind

Abstract

Classic endoscopic resection techniques (EMR and ESD) are limited to mucosal lesions. In the case of deeper growth into the gut wall and anatomic sites prone to perforation, the novel full-thickness resection device (FTRD(®)) opens a new dimension of possibilities for endoscopic resection. Sixty patients underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) at our institution. Safety, learning curve, R0 resection rate, and clinical outcome were studied. In 97% (58/60) of the interventions, the FTRD(®)-mounted endoscope reached the previously marked lesion and eFTR was performed (technical success). Full-thickness resection was achieved in 88% of the cases, with an R0 resection on histological examination in 79%. The clinical success rate based on follow-up histology was even higher (88%). Adverse events occurred in 7%. Appendicitis of the residual cecal appendix after eFTR of an adenoma arising in the appendix led to the only post-eFTR surgery (1/58, 2%). Minor bleeding at the eFTR site (2/58, 3%) and an eFTR performed accidently without proper prior deployment of the OTSC(®) (1/58, 2%) were successfully treated endoscopically. There was no secondary perforation or eFTR-associated mortality. After specific training, eFTR is a feasible, safe, and promising all-in-one endoscopic resection technique. Our data show that eFTR allows complete resection of lesions affecting layers of the gut wall beneath the mucosa with a low risk of adverse events. However, our preliminary results need to be confirmed in larger, controlled studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Other 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Chemistry 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,467,628
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,830
of 6,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,591
of 315,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#89
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.