| Title |
The Role of Practice Research Networks (PRN) in the Development and Implementation of Evidence: The Northern Improving Access to Psychological Therapies PRN Case Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-017-0810-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mike Lucock, Michael Barkham, Gillian Donohoe, Stephen Kellett, Dean McMillan, Sarah Mullaney, Andrew Sainty, David Saxon, Richard Thwaites, Jaime Delgadillo |
| Abstract |
Practice research networks (PRNs) can support the implementation of evidence based practice in routine services and generate practice based evidence. This paper describes the structure, processes and learning from a new PRN in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme in England, in relation to an implementation framework and using one study as a case example. Challenges related to: ethics and governance processes; communications with multiple stakeholders; competing time pressures and linking outcome data. Enablers included: early tangible outputs and impact; a collaborative approach; engaging with local research leads; clarity of processes; effective dissemination; and committed leadership. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 67% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,910,394
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#99
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,535
of 315,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.