↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of cardiac myocyte cell death and differentiation by myocardin

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Regulation of cardiac myocyte cell death and differentiation by myocardin
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11010-017-3100-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph W. Gordon

Abstract

Myocardin is a cardiac- and smooth muscle-enriched transcriptional co-activator that was originally described as an interacting partner of the serum response factor. Shortly after myocardin's discovery, a wealth of published literature described the role of myocardin as a regulator of smooth muscle differentiation and phenotype modulation, while gene-targeting studies confirmed the essential role of myocardin in vascular development. More recently, myocardin has been implicated as an important regulator of cardiac myocyte differentiation in studies demonstrating direct programming of fibroblasts towards the cardiac lineage. This function of myocardin has been attributed to its physical interaction with cardiac-enriched transcription factors such as MEF2C, GATA4, and TBX5. Moreover, conditional knockout models have revealed a critical role for myocardin during cardiac chamber maturation, and a surprising function for myocardin in the regulation of cardiomyocyte proliferation, cell death, and possibly mitochondrial function. This review summarizes the literature surrounding the cardiac-specific roles of myocardin during development and post-natal cardiac remodeling. In addition, we take a bioinformatics and computational approach to discuss known and predicted interactions and biological functions of myocardin, which suggests areas for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,002,312
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#87
of 2,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,855
of 330,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.