| Title |
The impact of inspired oxygen concentration on tissue oxygenation during progressive haemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-009-1577-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Dyson, Ray Stidwill, Val Taylor, Mervyn Singer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 68% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,865
of 5,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,402
of 110,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.