↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor in severe obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor in severe obesity
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1078-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauro Maniscalco, Anna Zedda, Stanislao Faraone, Pierluigi Carratù, Matteo Sofia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,865
of 5,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,692
of 81,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.