↓ Skip to main content

Management of Confirmed Newborn-Screened Patients With Pompe Disease Across the Disease Spectrum

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of Confirmed Newborn-Screened Patients With Pompe Disease Across the Disease Spectrum
Published in
Pediatrics, July 2017
DOI 10.1542/peds.2016-0280e
Pubmed ID
Authors

David F. Kronn, Debra Day-Salvatore, Wuh-Liang Hwu, Simon A. Jones, Kimitoshi Nakamura, Torayuki Okuyama, Kathryn J. Swoboda, Priya S. Kishnani

Abstract

After a Pompe disease diagnosis is confirmed in infants identified through newborn screening (NBS), when and if to start treatment with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa must be determined. In classic infantile-onset Pompe disease, ERT should start as soon as possible. Once started, regular, routine follow-up is necessary to monitor for treatment effects, disease progression, and adverse effects. Decision-making for when or if to start ERT in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is more challenging because patients typically have no measurable signs or symptoms or predictable time of symptom onset at NBS. With LOPD, adequate, ongoing follow-up and assessments for onset or progression of signs and symptoms are important to track disease state and monitor and adjust care before and after treatment is started. Because numerous tests are used to monitor patients at variable frequencies, a standardized approach across centers is lacking. Significant variability in patient assessments may result in missed opportunities for early intervention. Management of Pompe disease requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach with timely disease-specific interventions that target the underlying disease process and symptom-specific manifestations. Regardless of how identified, all patients who have signs or symptoms of the disease require coordinated medical care and follow-up tailored to individual needs throughout their lives. The Pompe Disease Newborn Screening Working Group identifies key considerations before starting and during ERT; summarizes what comprises an indication to start ERT; and provides guidance on how to determine appropriate patient management and monitoring and guide the frequency and type of follow-up assessments for all patients identified through NBS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,966,762
of 24,878,531 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#14,004
of 18,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,303
of 319,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#140
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,878,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.