↓ Skip to main content

Hysterical Again: The Gastrointestinal Woman in Medical Discourse

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Humanities, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 445)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Hysterical Again: The Gastrointestinal Woman in Medical Discourse
Published in
Journal of Medical Humanities, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10912-012-9196-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Vidali

Abstract

This article suggests increased attention to how medical discourses of gastrointestinal (GI) disorder and distress are fraught with social assumptions and consequences by examining nineteenth-century and contemporary medical texts focused on chronic constipation and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). I suggest that these medical discourses present what I call the "gastrointestinal woman," who is characterized as having unjustified anxiety and is to blame for her condition. My approach to understanding, and ultimately revising, the representation of the gastrointestinal woman is shaped by disability studies scholarship, which encourages intervention in problematic medical discourses and more active shaping of discourses of chronic pain and illness by those who have these conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Psychology 5 16%
Linguistics 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,553,972
of 24,287,697 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Humanities
#29
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,405
of 284,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Humanities
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.