You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large filter feeding marine organisms as indicators of microplastic in the pelagic environment: The case studies of the Mediterranean basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) and fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Environmental Research, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.02.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Cristina Fossi, Daniele Coppola, Matteo Baini, Matteo Giannetti, Cristiana Guerranti, Letizia Marsili, Cristina Panti, Eleonora de Sabata, Simona Clò |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 74% |
| Scientists | 12 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 844 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 824 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 148 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 129 | 15% |
| Researcher | 112 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 108 | 13% |
| Other | 37 | 4% |
| Other | 109 | 13% |
| Unknown | 201 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 226 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 223 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 39 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 67 | 8% |
| Unknown | 242 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#566,893
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Marine Environmental Research
#12
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,050
of 238,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Environmental Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.