↓ Skip to main content

Animal-derived natural products of Sowa Rigpa medicine: Their pharmacopoeial description, current utilization and zoological identification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnopharmacology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Animal-derived natural products of Sowa Rigpa medicine: Their pharmacopoeial description, current utilization and zoological identification
Published in
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2017.06.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karma Yeshi, Paolo Morisco, Phurpa Wangchuk

Abstract

Bhutan has two traditional healing systems: a folklore medicine and the Bhutanese Sowa Rigpa medicine (BSM). Three different types of ingredients namely plants, animals (and their derived products) and minerals are used for the preparation of various formulations in combined form. Animals and their derived products are vital ingredients in the preparation of numerous traditional remedies. Unlike medicinal plants, research on medicinal animals has remained largely untouched. This study is aimed to investigate the animal-derived natural products used in BSM as a zootherapeutic agents, taxonomically identify the medicinal animals, and shed lights on their positive as well as undesired implications. A five stage process was conducted which consisted of: (1) a survey of specialized ancient ethnomedical texts (Pharmacopoeias and formularies) to list animal products used as ingredients; (2) identify the natural products from animals used as ingredients by consulting Traditional Physicians (Drungtshos) and other experts at Menjong Sorig Pharmaceutical (MSP); (3) collect information about number and types of diseases treated by each animal ingredient; (4) confirm the list of animal ingredients separately as currently used, total medicinal animals described in the traditional text books, and those which are substituted by plants; (5) ethno-pharmacological uses of each animal ingredients were translated with the help of Traditional Physicians, clinical assistants and experts at MSP. The nomenclature of identified animal ingredients was confirmed by crosschecking the descriptions with the series of translated books of vernacular literature, scientific papers on animal ingredients, and the animal databases. The study reported 73 natural products belonging to 29 categories derived from 45 medicinal animals (36 vertebrates and 9 invertebrates) which are used as ingredients in Bhutanese Sowa Rigpa medicine system to prepare various formulations. The identified species comprise 9 taxonomic categories and belong to 30 zoological families. The groups with highest number of species were mammals (n = 26; 19 - wild and 7 - domestic), birds (n = 5), reptiles (n = 3), gastropods (n = 3) and insects (n = 3). Out of 116 formulations currently produced, 87 of them contain one or more extracts and products obtained from 13 medicinal animals to treat more than 124 illnesses. This demonstrates the importance of zootherapy as alternative therapy in Bhutan. Only five (5) animal ingredients namely Bear's bile (dom-m.khris), male musk deer's naval musk gland (gla-rtsi), pig's blood (phag-khrag), red deer's horn (śa-rwa) and red deer's immature horn (śa'i-khrag-rwa) were found available in Bhutan, the rest being imported from neighbouring countries like India. There is an increasing demand for animals and their parts in the traditional medicines (TMs) but MSP prefers plant substitutes due to difficulties in obtaining the animal parts. In this study, we identified 73 natural products belonging to 29 categories derived from 45 medicinal animals (36 vertebrates and 9 invertebrates) in the Sowa Rigpa medicine. 13 medicinal animals were currently included in formulating 87 essential multi-ingredient prescription medicines in BSM to cure multiple diseases. This demonstrates the importance of zootherapy as alternative therapy in Bhutan. The Bhutanese Sowa Rigpa medicinal fauna is largely based on wild animals (n = 38; 84.4%), including some endangered species. Only 2 of the medicinal animals were substituted by plants.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#5,115
of 7,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,979
of 331,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#40
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.