↓ Skip to main content

Social Inequalities in Obesity Persist in the Nordic Region Despite Its Relative Affluence and Equity

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Social Inequalities in Obesity Persist in the Nordic Region Despite Its Relative Affluence and Equity
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13679-013-0087-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Magnusson, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Steingerdur Olafsdottir, Susanna Lehtinen-Jacks, Turid Lingaas Holmen, Berit Lilienthal Heitmann, Lauren Lissner

Abstract

Social inequalities in overweight and obesity (OWOB) have persisted in the affluent and reputedly egalitarian Nordic countries. In this review we examine associations between socioeconomic position (SEP) and OWOB, and secular trends in such associations. Determinants and possible causes of the relations are discussed together with opportunities to cope with OWOB as a public health problem. The findings show a persisting inverse social gradient. An interaction between SEP and gender is noted for adults in Denmark, Finland and Iceland and for children in Sweden. There are overall tendencies for increased inequality, however no consistent trend for an increased social gradient in OWOB. Reasons that increased inequality does not unequivocally mirror in a steepened social gradient in obesity may include methodological questions as well as societal efforts to counteract obesity. Multi-level efforts are needed to prevent OWOB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Master 14 16%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 36%
Social Sciences 17 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#195
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,851
of 321,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.