↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Detection and replication of epistasis influencing transcription in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
70 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Detection and replication of epistasis influencing transcription in humans
Published in
Nature, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gibran Hemani, Konstantin Shakhbazov, Harm-Jan Westra, Tonu Esko, Anjali K. Henders, Allan F. McRae, Jian Yang, Greg Gibson, Nicholas G. Martin, Andres Metspalu, Lude Franke, Grant W. Montgomery, Peter M. Visscher, Joseph E. Powell

Abstract

Epistasis is the phenomenon whereby one polymorphism's effect on a trait depends on other polymorphisms present in the genome. The extent to which epistasis influences complex traits and contributes to their variation is a fundamental question in evolution and human genetics. Although often demonstrated in artificial gene manipulation studies in model organisms, and some examples have been reported in other species, few examples exist for epistasis among natural polymorphisms in human traits. Its absence from empirical findings may simply be due to low incidence in the genetic control of complex traits, but an alternative view is that it has previously been too technically challenging to detect owing to statistical and computational issues. Here we show, using advanced computation and a gene expression study design, that many instances of epistasis are found between common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In a cohort of 846 individuals with 7,339 gene expression levels measured in peripheral blood, we found 501 significant pairwise interactions between common SNPs influencing the expression of 238 genes (P < 2.91 × 10(-16)). Replication of these interactions in two independent data sets showed both concordance of direction of epistatic effects (P = 5.56 × 10(-31)) and enrichment of interaction P values, with 30 being significant at a conservative threshold of P < 9.98 × 10(-5). Forty-four of the genetic interactions are located within 5 megabases of regions of known physical chromosome interactions (P = 1.8 × 10(-10)). Epistatic networks of three SNPs or more influence the expression levels of 129 genes, whereby one cis-acting SNP is modulated by several trans-acting SNPs. For example, MBNL1 is influenced by an additive effect at rs13069559, which itself is masked by trans-SNPs on 14 different chromosomes, with nearly identical genotype-phenotype maps for each cis-trans interaction. This study presents the first evidence, to our knowledge, for many instances of segregating common polymorphisms interacting to influence human traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 4%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 349 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 31%
Researcher 104 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 7%
Professor 25 7%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 20 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 11%
Computer Science 24 6%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 34 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2021.
All research outputs
#630,215
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#25,341
of 95,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,857
of 226,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#410
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.