↓ Skip to main content

Bootstrapping the QCD soft anomalous dimension

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Bootstrapping the QCD soft anomalous dimension
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/jhep09(2017)073
Authors

Øyvind Almelid, Claude Duhr, Einan Gardi, Andrew McLeod, Chris D. White

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#17,887
of 24,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,216
of 325,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#419
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.