↓ Skip to main content

Equity in Health Care from a Communitarian Standpoint

Overview of attention for article published in Health Care Analysis, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Equity in Health Care from a Communitarian Standpoint
Published in
Health Care Analysis, June 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1016583100955
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan Black, Gavin Mooney

Abstract

Equity in health and health care is an important issue. It has been proposed that the pursuit of equity in health care is being hampered by the dominance of individualism in health care practices. This paper explores the way in which communitarian ideals and practices might lend themselves to the pursuit of equity. Communitarians acknowledge, respect and foster the bonds that unite and identify communities. The paper argues that, to achieve equity in health care, these bonds need to be recognised and harnessed rather than ignored. The notion of individual autonomy in the context of the community is examined. Alternative concepts of autonomy--social autonomy and community autonomy--are seen to be more respectful and nurturing of both the individual and the community. Moreover, these concepts appear desirable for the pursuit of health care equity goals. The paper concludes with some thoughts about how equity in Australia's health care system can reasonably progress within a communitarian vision. Disadvantaged communities are discussed throughout, in particular, Australian Aboriginal communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 36 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 22%
Social Sciences 7 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Philosophy 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Analysis
#280
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,566
of 126,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Analysis
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.