↓ Skip to main content

Fiscal equalisation: Principles and an application to the European Union

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Fiscal equalisation: Principles and an application to the European Union
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00355-003-0252-8
Authors

Bernd Hayo, Matthias Wrede

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2010.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#154
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,266
of 143,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.