You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
過去からのメディア論 図書館における寄贈本の受難:学術資料としての可能性とその限界
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1241/johokanri.60.279 |
| Authors |
大谷 卓史 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 13 | 32% |
| Unknown | 28 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 93% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,256,800
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#25
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,499
of 327,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.