You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
書評:『図書館情報学を学ぶ人のために(学ぶ人のために)』逸村裕・田窪直規・原田隆史 編
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.18919/jkg.67.7_393 |
| Authors |
松林 正己 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,432,468
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#111
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,827
of 326,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.