↓ Skip to main content

Polypharmacy in Heart Failure Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Current Heart Failure Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 325)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Polypharmacy in Heart Failure Patients
Published in
Current Heart Failure Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11897-014-0186-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vittoria Mastromarino, Matteo Casenghi, Marco Testa, Erica Gabriele, Roberta Coluccia, Speranza Rubattu, Massimo Volpe

Abstract

In heart failure (HF), the progressive use of multiple drugs and a complex therapeutic regimen is common and is recommended by international guidelines. With HF being a common disease in the elderly, patients often have numerous comorbidities that require additional specific treatment, thus producing a heavy pill burden. Polypharmacy, defined as the chronic use of five or more medications, is an underestimated problem in the management of HF patients. However, polypharmacy has an important impact on HF treatment, as it often leads to inappropriate drug prescription, poor adherence to pharmacological therapies, drug-drug interactions, and adverse effects. The growing complexity of HF patients, whose mean age increases progressively and who present multiple comorbidities, suggests the need for newer models of primary care to improve the management of HF patients. Self-care, telemonitoring, and natriuretic peptide-guided therapy represent promising new HF care models to face the complexity of the disease and its therapeutic regimen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,899,467
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Current Heart Failure Reports
#22
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,331
of 310,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Heart Failure Reports
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.