↓ Skip to main content

Development of In Vivo Imaging Tools for Investigating Astrocyte Activation in Epileptogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Development of In Vivo Imaging Tools for Investigating Astrocyte Activation in Epileptogenesis
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12035-017-0660-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chrysavgi Kostoula, Rosaria Pascente, Teresa Ravizza, Thomas McCown, Susanne Schoch, Annamaria Vezzani, Albert J. Becker, Karen M. J van Loo

Abstract

Insights into the dynamic changes in molecular processes occurring in the brain during epileptogenesis can substantially improve our understanding of their pathogenetic relevance. In this context, neuroinflammation is a potential mechanism of epileptogenesis which has recently been investigated in animal models by MRI or PET molecular imaging. Here, we developed an alternative and complementary molecular imaging strategy by designing a serotype 8 recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV8) harboring promoter fragments of the GFAP or IL-1β promoter and a luciferase reporter gene. Mice were injected intrahippocampally with rAAV8 and treated with intracortical kainic acid to induce status epilepticus (SE) and hence epileptogenesis. In vivo bioluminescence imaging combined with immunohistochemistry revealed a significant activation of the GFAP promoter 24 h and 3 days after kainate-induced SE. For IL-1β, we identified the promoter region required for studying cell-specific induction of the promoter in longitudinal studies. We conclude that the GFAP promoter fragment represents a useful tool for monitoring the in vivo activation of astrocytes with an inflammatory phenotype during epileptogenesis, or under other pathophysiological conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,467,628
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,076
of 3,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,638
of 314,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#41
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.