↓ Skip to main content

Efficient Heritable Gene Expression Readily Evolves in RNA Pools

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Efficient Heritable Gene Expression Readily Evolves in RNA Pools
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00239-017-9800-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Yarus

Abstract

Heritable gene expression arises readily in a simple non-genetic system employing known small-RNA biochemistry. Pooled cross-templating ribonucleotides show varied chemical competence on which selection acts, even calculating only minimal effects. Evolution can be quick-computed progress toward encoded gene expression can require only days or weeks for two millimolar, partly activated complementary 5' ribonucleotides. After only one product selection cycle, early templating can become prevailing pool behavior. Subsequently, a selected templated product is efficiently amplified as a pool ages, frequently accumulated in the same order of concentration as incoming nucleotides. Pools spontaneously favor templating because sporadic nucleotide accumulations increase it-and selection increases templating in pools of all ages. Nonetheless, templated chemical competence appears most easily in young pools. Pool history is critical-pools can perish from periodic hazards (like tides), or alternatively, from hazards roughly constant in time (like rainfall). Selection is greatly enhanced in constant hazard pools-more effective if pools have varied ages. Stronger selection is disproportionately more effective. Selected evolutionary change has an uncomplicated molecular basis-progress from chemical product synthesis to templated, proto-genetic inheritance exploits identity between templating and entropic catalysis. Though discovered by computation, selection of an elevated product of template catalysis is plausible, independent of any chemical or mathematical assumption. Selected chemical variation before genetics (chance utility) therefore inaugurates inheritance, even when hindered by unstable, dilute nucleotides, erratically supplied in undependable quantities. Remarkably, such uncontrolled conditions are not necessarily hostile, but can instead accelerate appearance of primordial gene-like behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Master 2 40%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,431,953
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1,383
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,848
of 314,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.